Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Brendan Lawlor <blawlor@clamsnet.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@openfifth.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
This commit is generated using:
% perl misc/devel/tidy.pl
*within* ktd, to get the same version of perltidy than what will be used
by our CI (currently v20230309).
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
On bug 17591 we discovered that there was something weird going on with
the way we export and use subroutines/modules.
This patch tries to standardize our EXPORT to use EXPORT_OK only.
That way we will need to explicitely define the subroutine we want to
use from a module.
This patch is a squashed version of:
Bug 17600: After export.pl
Bug 17600: After perlimport
Bug 17600: Manual changes
Bug 17600: Other manual changes after second perlimports run
Bug 17600: Fix tests
And a lot of other manual changes.
export.pl is a dirty script that can be found on bug 17600.
"perlimport" is:
git clone https://github.com/oalders/App-perlimports.git
cd App-perlimports/
cpanm --installdeps .
export PERL5LIB="$PERL5LIB:/kohadevbox/koha/App-perlimports/lib"
find . \( -name "*.pl" -o -name "*.pm" \) -exec perl App-perlimports/script/perlimports --inplace-edit --no-preserve-unused --filename {} \;
The ideas of this patch are to:
* use EXPORT_OK instead of EXPORT
* perltidy the EXPORT_OK list
* remove '&' before the subroutine names
* remove some uneeded use statements
* explicitely import the subroutines we need within the controllers or
modules
Note that the private subroutines (starting with _) should not be
exported (and not used from outside of the module except from tests).
EXPORT vs EXPORT_OK (from
https://www.thegeekstuff.com/2010/06/perl-exporter-examples/)
"""
Export allows to export the functions and variables of modules to user’s namespace using the standard import method. This way, we don’t need to create the objects for the modules to access it’s members.
@EXPORT and @EXPORT_OK are the two main variables used during export operation.
@EXPORT contains list of symbols (subroutines and variables) of the module to be exported into the caller namespace.
@EXPORT_OK does export of symbols on demand basis.
"""
If this patch caused a conflict with a patch you wrote prior to its
push:
* Make sure you are not reintroducing a "use" statement that has been
removed
* "$subroutine" is not exported by the C4::$MODULE module
means that you need to add the subroutine to the @EXPORT_OK list
* Bareword "$subroutine" not allowed while "strict subs"
means that you didn't imported the subroutine from the module:
- use $MODULE qw( $subroutine list );
You can also use the fully qualified namespace: C4::$MODULE::$subroutine
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Chris Nighswonger <cnighswonger@foundations.edu>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
http://bugs.koha-community.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9987
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
When working with hierarchical subject headings, it is sometimes helpful
to do a search for all records with a specific subject, plus
broader/narrower/related subjects. This patch adds a suggestion plugin for
these "exploded" subject searches to Koha. Note that this patch depends on
both bug 8211 AND bug 8209.
To test (NOTE: this test plan covers both 8211 and 8726):
1) Make sure you have a bunch of hierarchical subjects. I created
geographical subjects for "Arizona," "United States," and "Phoenix,"
and linked them together using 551s, and made sure I had a half
dozen records linking to each (but not all to all three).
2) Do a search for su-br:Arizona (or choose "Subject and broader terms"
on the advanced search screen with "more options" displayed), and
check that you get the records with the subject "Arizona" and the
records with the subject "United States"
3) Do a search for su-na:Arizona (or choose "Subject and narrower terms"
on the advanced search screen with "more options" displayed), and
check that you get the records with the subject "Arizona" and the
records with the subject "Phoenix"
4) Do a search for su-rl:Arizona (or choose "Subject and related terms"
on the advanced search screen with "more options" displayed), and
check that you get the records with the subject "Arizona," the
records with the subject "United States," and the records with the
subject "Phoenix"
5) Ensure that other searches still work (keyword, subject, ccl,
whatever)
6) Use "Did you mean?" page in admin section to enable ExplodedTerms
plugin
7) Do a keyword search on the OPAC, confirm that searching for exploded
terms is suggested.
8) Do a subject search on the OPAC, confirm that searching for exploded
terms is suggested.
9) Do a non-keyword, non-subject search on the OPAC, confirm that
searching for exploded terms is NOT suggested.
10) Disable ExplodedTerms plugin and enable AuthorityFile plugin.
11) Do search on OPAC, confirm suggestions are made from authority file.
12) Sign off
Signed-off-by: wajasu <matted-34813@mypacks.net>
Signed-off-by: Jared Camins-Esakov <jcamins@cpbibliography.com>
Split into two patches. This patch includes only the functionality.
One of the ideas behind authority records is that users who search for
one term should have related terms (according to the authority file)
suggested to them. At the moment, Koha doesn't do that. Adding an
authority searching step to regular searches and displaying any
suggestions in a "Did you mean" bar at the top of the results would be
very useful.
This commit adds a Koha::SuggestionEngine class which is in charge of
getting suggestions from individual suggestion engine plugins, which
much be in the Koha::SuggestionEngine::Plugin::* namespace, and extend
Koha::SuggestionEngine::Base. Suggestions are loaded asynchronously
using AJAX, and a link to a page with suggestions is provided for users
with Javascript turned off.
The AuthorityFile suggestion engine plugin looks up the specified search
terms in the authority file and then suggests searches for records using
matching authorities.
Signed-off-by: Jared Camins-Esakov <jcamins@cpbibliography.com>
Rebased 2 August 2012 and incorporated QA feedback
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Test plan:
- Verified database update added system preference correctly,
pref defaults to OFF
- Verified search results and detail pages in OPAC and staff
still worked the same as before
* for no results
* with results
- Activated system preference and tested various searches
* Searches from simple search
* Searches from advanced search
* Search links in records
- Deactivated Javascript - verified fallback works correctly
Notes:
- Suggested terms can include autorities with no linked records.
- When combining more than one search option using advanced search
this results in "no suggestions" more often. Feature works best
from simple search.
Overall great feature making use of authorities in a user friendly way!
Signed-off-by: Jared Camins-Esakov <jcamins@cpbibliography.com>
Rebased on latest master 2012-09-10
Signed-off-by: wajasu <matted-34813@mypacks.net>