This has the same goals of bug 24975 but with a different approach.
Bug 24975 tried the "POT/PO files as database tables" approach but
it appeared that is not what best fits our needs.
Instead of a "source text / translated text" mapping, we need
translations to be attached to a specific "object" (or table row), which
has the added benefit of keeping translations unaffected when the
original string changes. It may or may not be what you want but at least
this avoids the problem where fixing an error in the original string
forces users to re-translate everything.
We also need to be able to translate all translatable properties of a
particular entity.
The solution proposed here is to add a DBIC component that will add
several DBIC relations to the `localization` table:
* a relation named `localizations` that will return all translations for
all translatable properties for all languages.
* for each translatable property:
* a relation named `{$property}_localizations` that will return all
translations for a given property, for all languages
* a relation named `{$property}_localization` that will return the
translation for a given property, for the current language
To enable translations for a particular entity, we will need to:
* add two method calls in the "result class" corresponding to the
localizable object type
* in the admin interface, add a link to the the translation popup.
Unlike bug 24975 there is not a page where you can translate
everything. I don't know if it is really useful (probably better to
translate itemtypes when you are on the itemtype page). It can be
added later if needed.
To give an example, this is what needs to be added manually in
Koha/Schema/Result/Itemtype.pm:
__PACKAGE__->load_components('+Koha::DBIx::Class::Localization');
__PACKAGE__->localization_add_relationships(
'itemtype', # the PK column
'description' # a list of translatable columns
);
(see POD in Koha/Schema/Component/Localization.pm for more information)
Final notes:
* I wanted this patch to have as few changes as possible so I kept
methods like `search_with_localization`, `children_with_localization`
even if I believe they can be removed (replaced by search/children)
Localizations do not need to be prefetched/joined unless you want to
sort on them.
For the same reason, $itemtype->unblessed now always return a
`translated_description` key.
This can be fixed in followup patches
* There is cache involved (see
Koha::Schema::Component::Localization::localization).
Localizations in cache are grouped by object type and language (keys
look like 'KOHA:localization:Itemtype:en')
* By keeping a single table for all translations of all entities, we
cannot have data integrity at the RDBMS level, but automatic deletion
of translations is handled by the DBIC `cascade_delete` feature, so
integrity should be fine as long as no raw SQL update/delete operation
is involved.
Signed-off-by: Caroline Cyr La Rose <caroline.cyr-la-rose@inlibro.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Brendan Lawlor <blawlor@clamsnet.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@openfifth.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
Test plan:
Try to translate itemtype for an opac language not part of
intranet languages.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
This commit is generated using:
% perl misc/devel/tidy.pl
*within* ktd, to get the same version of perltidy than what will be used
by our CI (currently v20230309).
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
On bug 17591 we discovered that there was something weird going on with
the way we export and use subroutines/modules.
This patch tries to standardize our EXPORT to use EXPORT_OK only.
That way we will need to explicitely define the subroutine we want to
use from a module.
This patch is a squashed version of:
Bug 17600: After export.pl
Bug 17600: After perlimport
Bug 17600: Manual changes
Bug 17600: Other manual changes after second perlimports run
Bug 17600: Fix tests
And a lot of other manual changes.
export.pl is a dirty script that can be found on bug 17600.
"perlimport" is:
git clone https://github.com/oalders/App-perlimports.git
cd App-perlimports/
cpanm --installdeps .
export PERL5LIB="$PERL5LIB:/kohadevbox/koha/App-perlimports/lib"
find . \( -name "*.pl" -o -name "*.pm" \) -exec perl App-perlimports/script/perlimports --inplace-edit --no-preserve-unused --filename {} \;
The ideas of this patch are to:
* use EXPORT_OK instead of EXPORT
* perltidy the EXPORT_OK list
* remove '&' before the subroutine names
* remove some uneeded use statements
* explicitely import the subroutines we need within the controllers or
modules
Note that the private subroutines (starting with _) should not be
exported (and not used from outside of the module except from tests).
EXPORT vs EXPORT_OK (from
https://www.thegeekstuff.com/2010/06/perl-exporter-examples/)
"""
Export allows to export the functions and variables of modules to user’s namespace using the standard import method. This way, we don’t need to create the objects for the modules to access it’s members.
@EXPORT and @EXPORT_OK are the two main variables used during export operation.
@EXPORT contains list of symbols (subroutines and variables) of the module to be exported into the caller namespace.
@EXPORT_OK does export of symbols on demand basis.
"""
If this patch caused a conflict with a patch you wrote prior to its
push:
* Make sure you are not reintroducing a "use" statement that has been
removed
* "$subroutine" is not exported by the C4::$MODULE module
means that you need to add the subroutine to the @EXPORT_OK list
* Bareword "$subroutine" not allowed while "strict subs"
means that you didn't imported the subroutine from the module:
- use $MODULE qw( $subroutine list );
You can also use the fully qualified namespace: C4::$MODULE::$subroutine
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
There is a "debug" parameter we are passing from the controller scripts
to C4::Auth::get_template_and_user, but it's not actually used!
Test plan:
Confirm the assumption
Review the changes from this patch
Generated with:
perl -p -i -e 's#\s*debug\s*=\>\s*(0|1),?\s*##gms' **/*.pl
git checkout misc/devel/update_dbix_class_files.pl # Wrong catch
+ Manual fix in acqui/neworderempty.pl
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
It defaults to 0 in get_template_and_user
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
So far the administration module only allowed for 2 permissions:
- circulation conditions (manage_circ_rules)
- everything else (parameters_remaining_permissions)
With this patch almost every section of the administration page
will have its own granular permission.
To test:
- Create different staff users:
1) One with parameters_remaining_permissions
2) One with parameters
3) One with catalogue and no parameters
4) One superlibrarian
- Apply the patch
- Run the database update
- Check the staff users:
1) All subpermissions, but manage_circ_rules
should be checked
2) Nothing should have changed
3) manage_item_serach_fields shoudl be checked
(page had catalogue permission before)
4) Nothing should have changed
- Try different settings of the permissions and
verify that
- Administration page behaves correctly
- Administration menu behaves correctly
! You shoudl only see what you have permission for
https://bugs.koha-community.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14391
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Test plan:
1/ update the Schema (misc/devel/update_dbix_class_files.pl)
2/ Translate templates for some languages (es-DE, de-DE for instance)
3/ Enable them in the pref (search for 'lang') for the staff interface
4/ Go on the item type admin page (admin/itemtypes.pl)
5/ Edit one
6/ Click on the 'translate for other languages' link
7/ You are now on the interface to translate the item type's description
in the languages you want. So translate some :)
8/ Go back on the item type list view (admin/itemtypes.pl)
9/ You should see the original description (non translated)
10/ Switch the language
11/ You should see the translated description in the correct language.
If the description is non translated, the original description is
displayed.
12/ On the different page where the item type is displayed, confirm that
the translated description appears.
Think further / Todo:
1/ Update all occurrences of the item type's description (DONE)
2/ Implement for authorised values
3/ Implement for syspref value (at least textarea)
4/ Implement for branch names
5/ Centralize all the translation on a single page in the admin area
...
N/ Implement a webservice to centralize all the translations and give
the ability to sync the item types/authorised values description with
the rest of the world (push and pull).
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Julian Maurice
Tomas Cohen Arazi
Marcel de Rooy
Koha Development Team
Jonathan Druart
Katrin Fischer
Jonathan Druart