These methods were introduced and used in an earlier iteration of the
code, they are no longer called from anywhere (the code in
Koha::Booking->store handles all cases instead) and thus I choose to
remove them rather than add unit tests for them.. They are simple
methods that could be re-introduced as required at a future date.
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
(cherry picked from commit 6b8c52104c)
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
This patch adds basic unit tests for the Koha::Item->find_booking
method.
Test plan
1) Run t/db_dependant/Koha/Item.t
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
(cherry picked from commit dab5694dad)
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch renames all occurences of the method.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
* Perltidies to pass the QA script
* Adds missing say statement to the database update
* Makes sure the tests pass on a database, where UpdateItemLocaton*
system preferences are not empty
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patchset shifts the logic for changing the item location on checkin
(controlled by the UpdateItemLocationOnCheckin system preference) to a
new subroutine in Koha/Items.pm
That subroutine logic is shared with the UpdateItemLocationOnCheckout
system preference.
Test plan:
1. Apply patches, update databases and restart services
2. Set the following system preferences:
- UpdateItemLocationOnCheckin:
FIC: PROC
- UpdateItemLocationOnCheckout:
PROC: FIC
3. Checkout an an item with items.location = 'PROC'. Observe it's
location is changed to 'FIC'
4. Return the item. Observe it's location is changed to 'PROC'
5. Change UpdateItemLocationOnCheckout to:
PROC: _BLANK_
6. Issue the item with items.location = 'PROC' and confirm it's location
is blanked on checkout
7. Issue and return an item with a different location e.g. 'REF' (don't
use 'CART' as this is blanked by bug 14576 on checkout).
Observe the location does not change on issue or return.
8. Run unit tests
sudo koha-shell kohadev
prove t/db_dependent/Circulation/issue.t
Sponsored-by: Toi Ohomai Institute of Technology, New Zealand
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch adds handling for circulation of booked materials.
We prevent checkouts of booked items during the booking period where the
booking is for another user.
We update the due date to match the end of booking period when checking
out to the user who the booking is for.
If a checkout would overlap a booking to another user, we ask the user if
they will accept a reduced due date so the booked item is returned in
time to fulfill the booking.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Janet McGowan <janet.mcgowan@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Caroline Cyr La Rose <caroline.cyr-la-rose@inlibro.com>
Signed-off-by: Laurence Rault <laurence.rault@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch updates the bookings logic to prevent placing a booking
on an item that is checked out to start prior to it's due date.
Test plan
1) Follow the previous test plans
2) Add a checkout of an item
3) Attempt to place a booking and note that the item is not available to
be booked until after it's due date.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Janet McGowan <janet.mcgowan@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Caroline Cyr La Rose <caroline.cyr-la-rose@inlibro.com>
Signed-off-by: Laurence Rault <laurence.rault@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch adds new Koha::Object based classes for bookings logic and
adds API controllers to expose the new bookings data via the REST API's.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Janet McGowan <janet.mcgowan@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Caroline Cyr La Rose <caroline.cyr-la-rose@inlibro.com>
Signed-off-by: Laurence Rault <laurence.rault@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch makes the effective not for loan status be set the item value
if not defined at itype level.
To test:
1. Apply the regressions tests patch
2. Run:
$ ktd --shell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/api/v1/items.t
=> FAIL: Tests fail!
3. Apply this patch
4. Repeat 2
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass!
5. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Might come back on the subject when resuming with bug 33636.
Test plan:
Run t/db_dependent/Koha/Statistics.t
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
[EDIT] Tidy Koha/Item.pm bit further. Ordered hash keys too.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
See the Bugzilla report. I have been asked to restore the former
tests although I definitely think that they are wrong. Will address
that on bug 34308 separately.
This currently has the side-effect of negative lost values being
interpreted as 'found'. (Do not use negative lost values!)
The added subtest still reflects that now. Added a few TODOs.
Test plan:
[1] Prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Items.t
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Test plan:
Run t/db_dependent/Koha/Item.t
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch prevents other items attached to a record from being displayed as 'recalled' by item-level recalls.
To test:
1. Ensure UseRecalls system preference is enabled and circulation rules relevant to recalls are configured. Set 'on shelf recalls allowed' circulation rule 'if any unavailable' for ease of testing.
2. Search for a record that has multiple items, or create one with multiple items. Check out two of the items (Item A and Item B) to a patron, Patron A.
3. Log into the OPAC as another patron, Patron B. Search for the record and place a recall. Choose to recall a specific item and select Item A.
4. Go back to the staff interface and view the catalogue detail page for the record. Notice that every item has a 'recalled by...' message, even though Item A was specifically recalled.
5. Log into the OPAC as another patron, Patron C. Search for the record and place a recall. Choose to recall a specific item, notice every item has a 'recalled by...' message. Select Item B and Confirm.
6. In your terminal, the 'Other items are not returned for item-level recalls' test should fail when running
prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Item.t
7. Apply the patch and restart services
8. Confirm tests at t/db_dependent/Koha/Item.t now pass
9. Refresh the staff interface, confirm only Items A and B have the recalled message and the recall patron information for each item is accurate
10. Log into the OPAC as another patron, Patron D. Search for the record and place a recall. Choose to recall a specific item. Confirm only Items A and B have the recalled message.
Sponsored-by: Toi Ohomai Institute of Technology
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Perltidied new code.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This simple method takes care of calculating the control branch for an
item and a patron, depending on a syspref.
It targets replacing C4::Reserves::GetReservesControlBranch
To test:
1. Apply this patch
2. Run:
$ kshell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Item.t
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass!
3. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch adds API's to allow for a checkout flow using the RESTful
API.
We add an availability endpoint to check an items current availability
status. The endpoint can be found at `/checkouts/availability` and is
a GET request that requires item_id and patron_id passed as parameters.
We return an availability object that includes blockers, confirms,
warnings and a confirmation token to be used for checkout.
We also add a corresponding checkout method to the `/checkouts` endpoint.
The method accepts a POST request with checkout details including item_id
, patron_id and the confirmation token in the body.
Future work: We should properly migrate CanBookBeIssued into Koha::* and
use that here instead of refering to C4::Circulation.
Signed-off-by: Silvia Meakins <smeakins@eso.org>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Going via result_set->has_column does cost actually nothing if
the object is already there.
Test plan:
Run again t/db_dependent/Koha/Item.t
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
get_yaml_pref_hash also allows invalid YAML and only parses a limited
subset so remove this method to avoid future issues.
To test):
Since tests already exists for C4::Context->yaml_preference and this
is a trivial change, do we really need a test plan for this?
Sponsored-by: Gothenburg University Library
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
To test:
1) Ensure the following tests pass
t/db_dependent/Koha/Item.t
t/db_dependent/Koha/Bibio.t
2) Go to a biblio (preferably as serial) with many items and
click "New" -> "New item" and note down the response time.
3) Apply the patch
4) Ensure tests in 1) still pass
5) Repeat step 2), the response time should be substantially
improved
Sponsored-by: Gothenburg University Library
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
No need to do a walk through on all the results.
Correcting two test descriptions on the way.
Test plan:
Run t/db_dependent/Koha/Item.t
Run t/db_dependent/Koha/Items.t
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Prefetching is useful, but we don't want to fetch all the inactive
transfers for an item. This patch adds a filtered relationship and
updates get_transfer(s) to use this
To test:
prove -v t/db_dependent/Koha/Item.t
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch stores the output from ->check_recall() (a Koha::Recall
object or undef) and reuses afterwards, on a ternaty operator.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch uses the patron category of the patron who requested the most
relevant recall to check for more specific circulation rules relating to
recalls. This ensures that patrons who are allowed to place recalls are
able to fill their recalls, especially when recalls are not generally
available for all patron categories.
To test:
1) Go to Administration -> System preferences and enable UseRecalls
2) Go to Administration -> Circulation and fines rules and set a general
All/All rule and a Category A/Itemtype A rule. All values can be set
however you like except for these recalls rules:
All/All rule:
Recalls allowed: 0
Recalls per record: 0
On shelf recalls allowed: if any unavailable
Category A/Itemtype A rule:
Recalls allowed: 5
Recalls per record: 5
On shelf recalls allowed: if any unavailable
3) Find an item of Itemtype A. Check it out to Patron A (any category).
4) Log into the OPAC as Patron B (of Category A). Find the item and
place a recall on the item.
5) Back in the staff interface, check in the item. This should trigger
the recalls process so you can allocate the item to Patron B's recall,
however the pop-up box to confirm the recall does not show. This is the
bug.
6) Apply the patch and restart services
7) Check in the item again. Confirm the pop-up box to confirm the recall
shows and you are able to allocate the item to Patron B's recall.
8) Confirm tests pass t/db_dependent/Koha/Item.t
Sponsored-by: Auckland University of Technology
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch fixes the FIXME for making the methods throw an exception.
Tests are added, and POD is adapted as well.
To test:
1. Apply this patch
2. Run:
$ ktd --shell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/api/v1/patrons* \
t/db_dependent/api/v1/holds.t \
t/db_dependent/Reserves* \
t/db_dependent/Hold* \
t/db_dependent/Koha/Hold* \
t/db_dependent/Items*
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass!
3. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
The patches made an assumption that patron would always be passed. It is
within Koha, but not in the Biblios tests.
There is no scenario where we can determine pickup locations that are not in
reference to a patron (who is picking it up?) so we should always have
this parameter
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Test plan:
1. Create an item bundle (see bug 28854 comment 458)
2. Create a biblio with one item and place a hold for this item.
3. Try to add the reserved item to the bundle
You should see a message saying that the item is reserved. Next to
this message should be a button "Ignore holds and add to bundle".
4. Click on the button. There should be a message saying that the item
was added to the bundle.
5. Close the modal window and verify that the item was correctly
added to the bundle
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutiosn.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
When trying to add a checked out item to an item bundle, an alert
message will show up, giving the user a chance to return the item
immediately before adding it to the bundle
Test plan:
1. Create an item bundle (see bug 28854 comment 458)
2. Create a biblio with one item and check out this item.
3. Try to add the checked out item to the bundle
You should see a message saying that the item is checked out. Next to
this message should be a button "Check in and add to bundle".
4. Click on the button. There should be a message saying that the item
was added to the bundle.
5. Close the modal window and verify that the item was correctly
returned and added to the bundle
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch ensures a record is indexed only after the renewal transaction
has completed successfully. Otherwise the job cannot be found by the background process
worker, becaue it was not yet in the DB
To test:
1 - Make sure you are using ES, and the es indexer is running
2 - tail -f /var/log/koha/kohadev/*.log
3 - Issue an item to a patron and renew it
4 - Note error in es-indexer-output.log like:
[2023/03/21 12:22:36] [WARN] No job found for id=157 main:: /kohadevbox/koha/misc/workers/es_indexer_daemon.pl (129)
5 - Apply patch
6 - Renew again
7 There should be no error
8 - Search for the record and confirm items info displays correctly
9 - View the background jobs in admin, confirm the most recent job has completed
Signed-off-by: Janusz Kaczmarek <januszop@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Acquisition/Order.t
3) git grep "can_edit_item("
should return no results
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
The api_strings_mapping method isn't really only about api strings.. we
deal with database fields in and out.. we just happen to then use those
in to_api to map in the api.
This patch simply renames the standard method whilst we're still early.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
We should stick to DB field names as long as possible to allow re-use
and only convert to api field names via to_api_mapping at the last
moment inside the parent to_api function.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch introduces the `api_strings_mapping` method to the
*Koha::Item* class, and makes the API spec for the following routes:
* GET /items
* GET /items/:item_id
* GET /acquisitions/orders
accept the new `+strings` parameter that can be passed through the
`x-koha-embed` header and was introduced by bug 26635. In the case of
/acquisitions/orders, you will need to use
x-koha-embed: items+strings
I introduce it here to highlight the flebility we introduced with bug
26635.
The `api_strings_mapping` method has its roots on the cool
`columns_to_str` method already present. The main differences:
* It is aware of the `public_read_list` for attributes so no hidden
information is exposed.
* Attribute names get mapped for consistency with the API (e.g.
`homebranch` is converted into `home_library_id`, etc).
* The data structure it returns includes information about the source
for the descriptions (e.g. it it is an authorised value, then `type`
will be `av`, and the related category information is returned so
dropdowns and such can be built. The same goes for other types as
`library`, `item_type` and `call_number_source`.
To test:
1. Apply this patch
2. Reload everything
3. Play with your favourite REST tool (e.g. Postman)
4. Try:
GET http://localhost:8081/api/v1/items
x-koha-embed: +strings
=> SUCCESS: You get a list of items, they include the new _strings
structure, and the contents make sense!
5. Repeat with a specific item:
GET http://localhost:8081/api/v1/items/14
x-koha-embed: +strings
=> SUCCESS: It all makes sense!
6. Sign off :-D
Sponsored-by: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Signed-off-by: Pedro Amorim <pedro.amorim@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Bob Bennhoff - CLiC <bbennhoff@clicweb.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
We need to determine if a book was lost by a patron, the clues we have
are previous charges. If we don't find any, we shouldn't charge a new fine
To test:
1 - set Lost item fee refund on return policy to "Refund lost item charge and charge new overdue fine", turn on FinesMode, make sure your circ rules charge fines
2 - have an itemtype / patron combo that charges an overdue fine
3 - check item out (with a due date in the future) and then right back in again
4 - confirm patron doesn't have a fine because the item was not late
5 - set the item to Lost
6 - in the database, edit the date_due of your checkout to a date in the past
7 - check the item in, it is marked found
8 - confirm your patron now has a fine
9 - Apply patch
10 - Repeat with a new item and patron
11 - Confirm no charges
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch makes the `Koha::Item->safe_to_delete` method return right
after one of the checked conditions is met. This way we avoid further DB
queries and processing.
No behavior change is expected
To test:
1. Run:
$ kshell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Item.t
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass!
2. Apply this patch
3. Repeat 1
=> SUCCESS: Tests STILL pass!
4. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Bug 32528: Change return logic
Back to 1 return statement
Prevent the Koha::Result::Boolean instanciation duplication
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Currently, the Koha::Item->safe_to_delete method checks (among other things) if there are existing waiting or in-transit holds.
It seems that 'In processing' should block item deletion as well.
This patch implements that.
To test:
1. Apply up to the regression tests
2. Run:
$ kshell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Item.t
=> FAIL: Boo! Tests fail!
3. Apply this patch
4. Repeat 2
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass!
5. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This is a follow-up for bug 28854 to prevent bundle type items from
being nested in to other bundles.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>