This patch makes ModItemTransfer trigger record indexing only on the
last call (in $transfer->transit). And extra parameter is added to
->transit to effectively honour the ModItemTransfer parameter.
I wanted to mention that bug 31212 highlighted an existing issue, not
catched by the current tests before its inclussion, because of the DT truncation
taking place.
To test:
1. Run:
$ ktd --shell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/Koha/SearchEngine/Indexer.t
=> FAIL: Indexing is requested twice, should only be once
2. Apply this patch
3. Repeat 1
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass! Indexing is requested only once!
4. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
NOTE: I have the impression that this unit test is quite
rudimentary. I do not see the apply function tested?
Test plan:
Run t/db_dependent/Koha/Item/Templates.t
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
tcohen amended: stray deps
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
We should use OO interface and leave encoding to database
layer.
Test plan:
Add a new item template containing real Unicode chars.
Save. Apply on new item.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch makes the `decoded_contents` method UTF-8 encode the data
before calling the relevant decode_json, as expected by the JSON library
[1].
To test:
1. Apply the regression tests patch
2. Run:
$ kshell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Item/Template.t
=> FAIL: Tests fail!
3. Apply this patch
4. Repeat 2
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass!
[1] `Any decoding or encoding (e.g. to UTF-8 or UTF-16) needs to be done
yourself, e.g. using the Encode module.` https://metacpan.org/pod/JSON
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch introduces the aforementioned method.
To test:
1. Apply this unit tests patch
2. Run:
$ kshell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Item/Transfers.t
=> FaIL: method not defined?
3. Apply this patch
4. Repeat 2
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass!
5. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Is that correct?!
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Here we go!
Disclaimer: this patch is huge and does many things, but splitting it in
several chunks would be time consuming and painful to rebase. However it
adds many tests and isolate/refactor code to make it way more reusable.
This patchset will make the "batch item modification" and "batch item
deletion" features use the task queue (reminder: Since bug 28158, and so
21.05.00, we do no longer use the old "background job" functionality and
the user does not get any info about the progress of the job).
More than that, more of the code to build an item form and a list of
items is now isolated in module (.pm) and include files (.inc)
We are reusing the changes made by bug 27526 that simplifies the way we
edit/create items (no more unecessary serialization Koha > MARC > MARCXML
> XML > HTML)
New module:
* Koha::BackgroundJob::BatchDeleteItem
Subclass for process item deletion in batch
* Koha::BackgroundJob::BatchUpdateItem
Subclass for process item modification in batch
* Koha::Item::Attributes
We needed an object to represent item's attributes that are not
mapped with a koha field (aka "more subfields xml")
This module will help us to create the marcxml from a hashref and the
reverse.
* Koha::UI::Form::Builder::Item
The code that was used to build the add/edit item form is
centralised in this module. In conjunction with the
subfields_for_item BLOCK (from html_helpers.inc) it will be really
easy to reuse this code in other places where the item form is used
(acquisition and serials modules)
* Koha::UI::Table::Builder::Items
Same as previously for the table. We are now using this table from 3
different places (batch item mod, batch item del, backgroung job
detail view) and the code is only in one place.
To use with items_table_batchmod BLOCK (still from html_helpers.inc)
This patch is fixing some bugs about repeatable subfields and regex. A UI
change will reflect the limitation: if you want to apply a regex on a
subfield you cannot add several subfields for the same subfield code.
Test plan:
Prepare the ground:
- Make sure you are always using a bibliographic/item record using the framework
you are modifying!
- Add some subfields for items that are not mapped with a koha field
(note that you can use 'é' for more fun, don't try more funny
characters)
- Make some subfields (mapped and not mapped with a kohafield)
repeatable
- Add default values to some of your subfields
There are 4 main screens to test:
1. Add/edit item form
The behaviour should be the same before and after this patch.
See test plan from bug 27526.
Those 2 prefs must be tested:
* SubfieldsToAllowForRestrictedEditing
* SubfieldsToUseWhenPrefill
2. Batch modification
a. Fill some values, play with repeatable and regex.
Note that the behaviour in master was buggy, only the first value was modified by the regex:
* With subfield = "a | b"
1 value added with "new"
=> "new | b"
* With subfield = "a | b"
2 new fields "new1","new2"
=> "new2 | b"
Important note: For repeatable subfields, a regex will apply on the subfields in
the "concatenated form". To apply the regex on all the different subfields of a given
subfield code you must use the "g" modifier.
This could be improved later, but keep in mind that it's not a regression or behaviour
change.
b. Play with the "Populate fields with default values from default framework" checkbox
c. Use this tool to modify items and play with the different sysprefs that
interfer with it:
* NewItemsDefaultLocation
* SubfieldsToAllowForRestrictedBatchmod
* MaxItemsToDisplayForBatchMod
* MaxItemsToProcessForBatchMod
3. Batch deletion
a. Batch delete some items
b. Check items out and try to delete them
c. Use the "Delete records if no items remain" checkbox to delete
bibliographic records without remaining items.
d. Play with the following sysprefs and confirm that it works as
expected:
* MaxItemsToDisplayForBatchDel
e. Stress the tool: Go to the confirmation screen with items that can be
deleted, don't request the job to be processed right away, but check the
item out before.
4. Background job detail view
You must have seen it already if you are curious and tested the above.
When a new modification or deletion batch is requested, the confirmation
screen will tell you that the job has enqueued. A link to the progress
of the job can be followed.
On this screen you will be able to see the result of the job once it's
fully processed.
QA notes:
* There are some FIXME's that are not blocker in my opinion. Feel free to
discuss them if you have suggestions.
* Do we still need MaxItemsToProcessForBatchMod?
* Prior to this patchset we had a "Return to the cataloging module" link
if we went from the cataloguing module and that the biblio was deleted.
We cannot longer know if the biblio will be deleted but we could display
a "Go to the cataloging module" link on the "job has been enqueued"
screen regardless from where we were coming from.
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
On bug 17591 we discovered that there was something weird going on with
the way we export and use subroutines/modules.
This patch tries to standardize our EXPORT to use EXPORT_OK only.
That way we will need to explicitely define the subroutine we want to
use from a module.
This patch is a squashed version of:
Bug 17600: After export.pl
Bug 17600: After perlimport
Bug 17600: Manual changes
Bug 17600: Other manual changes after second perlimports run
Bug 17600: Fix tests
And a lot of other manual changes.
export.pl is a dirty script that can be found on bug 17600.
"perlimport" is:
git clone https://github.com/oalders/App-perlimports.git
cd App-perlimports/
cpanm --installdeps .
export PERL5LIB="$PERL5LIB:/kohadevbox/koha/App-perlimports/lib"
find . \( -name "*.pl" -o -name "*.pm" \) -exec perl App-perlimports/script/perlimports --inplace-edit --no-preserve-unused --filename {} \;
The ideas of this patch are to:
* use EXPORT_OK instead of EXPORT
* perltidy the EXPORT_OK list
* remove '&' before the subroutine names
* remove some uneeded use statements
* explicitely import the subroutines we need within the controllers or
modules
Note that the private subroutines (starting with _) should not be
exported (and not used from outside of the module except from tests).
EXPORT vs EXPORT_OK (from
https://www.thegeekstuff.com/2010/06/perl-exporter-examples/)
"""
Export allows to export the functions and variables of modules to user’s namespace using the standard import method. This way, we don’t need to create the objects for the modules to access it’s members.
@EXPORT and @EXPORT_OK are the two main variables used during export operation.
@EXPORT contains list of symbols (subroutines and variables) of the module to be exported into the caller namespace.
@EXPORT_OK does export of symbols on demand basis.
"""
If this patch caused a conflict with a patch you wrote prior to its
push:
* Make sure you are not reintroducing a "use" statement that has been
removed
* "$subroutine" is not exported by the C4::$MODULE module
means that you need to add the subroutine to the @EXPORT_OK list
* Bareword "$subroutine" not allowed while "strict subs"
means that you didn't imported the subroutine from the module:
- use $MODULE qw( $subroutine list );
You can also use the fully qualified namespace: C4::$MODULE::$subroutine
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This reverts commit d0407686eb.
This commit was part of a series adding adding reverse transfers, i.e.
transfers that were created for transfers that were cancelled and
we wanted the item to return back to its sending library. This however
hid the information about transfer happening and we need another approach
to the problem.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This reverts commit 6c10582914.
This commit was part of a series adding adding reverse transfers, i.e.
transfers that were created for transfers that were cancelled and
we wanted the item to return back to its sending library. This however
hid the information about transfer happening and we need another approach
to the problem.
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Rebased-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
JD amended patch: restore Koha::Item::Transfer->from_library (we are
adding tests in a future patch).
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch re-instates the call to updateWrongTransfer to ensure the
transfer line is updated to reflect the new frombranch.
Test plan
note: when applying the patches, also update the database
1/ Check an item out from it's home library
2/ Check the item in at another library
(with AutomaticItemReturn system preferences enabled)
2a/ Accept the transfer and note we now have a transfer present from the
items check-in library to it's home library
3/ Check the item in at a third library
3a/ Note you are asked to return the item to it's home library.
3b/ With the patch applied, the modal title should highlight that a
'Wrong transfer' was detected.
4/ Go to the item record and note the holding library has been updated
to reflect where the item was most recently checked in.
4a/ With the patch applied the item status should reflect the last
checked in branch as the 'from' branch of the transfer.
5/ check-in from a 4th library, but use the 'Print slip' option for
accepting the transfer and confirm that also works.
6/ check-in from a 5th library, but use the 'Cancel' option and check
that this results in the item staying at it's current location and the
final transfer having been cancelled.
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
The `replace` option found in Koha::Item->request_transfer should be
passed through to Koha::Item::Transfer->cancel and prevent any reverse
transfers from being queued in such cases.
This prevents modItemTransfer from adding superflous reverse transfers
whenever it is used.
Test plan
1/ Run t/db_dependent/Koha/Item.t to prove the new tests pass
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch adds a transfer cancellation when a hold is cancelled.
Test plan
1/ Check an item out from it's homebranch
2/ Place a hold on that item for another user at a different branch
3/ Check the item in at it's homebranch and accept the transfer
4/ Cancel the hold
5/ Change to the second branch and check the item in
6/ Note that a transfer is triggered with the reason 'Transfer was
cancelled whilst in transit'
Signed-off-by: Petro Vashchuk <stalkernoid@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
JD amended patch: remove trailing whitespace
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch adds a reverse transfer if a transfer is cancelled whilst it
is in transit. This makes sure the item returns to it's original
location.
Signed-off-by: Petro Vashchuk <stalkernoid@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Test plan:
Run t/db_dependent/Koha/Item/Search/Field.t
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch adds handling for the datecancelled field in the in_transit
method.
Test plan
1/ Run the new unit test in t/db_dependent/Koha/Item/Transfer.t
Signed-off-by: Petro Vashchuk <stalkernoid@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
ModItemTransfer always replaces any existing transfers, including those
in transit.. so we needed to add a 'force' option to
Koha::Item::Transfer->cancel();
Signed-off-by: Kathleen Milne <kathleen.milne@cne-siar.gov.uk>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch adds the 'cancel' method to Koha::Item::Transfer which sets
the transfer as cancelled by updating the datecancelled field. We also
update Koha::Item->get_transfer here to accomodate for the new
resolution available for a transfer.
Test plan:
1/ Run the included unit tests additions (t/db_dependent/Koha/Items.t,
t/db_dependent/Koha/Item/Transfer.t
Signed-off-by: Kathleen Milne <kathleen.milne@cne-siar.gov.uk>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This method returns a boolean representing the in_transit state of the
transfer.
Test plan
1/ Run the included tests
Signed-off-by: Kathleen Milne <kathleen.milne@cne-siar.gov.uk>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Test plan
1/ Run the included unit tests
Signed-off-by: Kathleen Milne <kathleen.milne@cne-siar.gov.uk>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@helsinki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Bug 9978 should have fixed them all, but some were missing.
We want all the license statements part of Koha to be identical, and
using the GPLv3 statement.
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch also fixes documentation in Koha/Item/Transfer.pm and
Koha/Item/Transfers.pm.
Signed-off-by: Josef Moravec <josef.moravec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
package Koha::Item::Search::Field
function C4::SQLHelper::GetColumns
function C4::Items::SearchItems
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Tests run without error
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Item search is available at catalogue/itemsearch.pl (link is in
catalogue/search.pl)
It only uses SQL (not Zebra)
* Use DataTables and server-side processing to be able to filter on
individual columns after the first search is done.
* Allow to export results in CSV
* With Javascript disabled, search form still works (and CSV export too)
There is the possibility to define "Custom search fields" in a new admin
page admin/items_search_fields.pl (link is in admin/admin-home.pl)
A custom item search field is defined by:
* a name: its unique identifier
* a label: the text displayed to the user
* a MARC field/subfield: the field/subfield to query (it uses
ExtractValue)
* an authorised values list (optional): if defined the list is displayed
in the search form
New Perl dependency: Template::Plugin::JSON::Escape
Test plan:
1/ Apply the patch and run updatedatabase.pl
2/ Go to advanced search (staff interface), then click on "Go to item
search"
3/ Play with the search form! :)
In the 3rd fieldset you can add as many fields as you want and combine them with
boolean operators (AND, OR). You can use SQL jokers characters (%, _)
You can output to screen (in a DataTables table) or to a CSV file.
4/ In the DataTables table, play with filters and try sorting columns.
5/ Disable Javascript (with Firefox: extensions NoScript or YesScript,
or in about:config 'javascript.enabled' = false
6/ Reload the search page and do some searches on screen output. (there
is no sorting or filtering features, but there is still pagination)
7/ Try again CSV output.
8/ You can re-enable Javascript.
9/ Go to Administration > Items search fields
10/ Add a new field. Example for title (in UNIMARC):
Name: title
Label: Title
MARC field: 200
MARC subfield: a
Authorised values category: None
(add another field with an authorised values category to see the
difference).
11/ As you are there try to update and delete some fields.
12/ Go back to items search form. You can see in the 3rd fieldset that
your fields have appeared in the selects.
13/ Try searching on them.
14/ I think you're done :)
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Gonzalez Kriegel <bgkriegel@gmail.com>
Work as described. Good new option.
No koha-qa errors
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Tomas Cohen Arazi
Marcel de Rooy
Kyle Hall
Jonathan Druart
Joonas Kylmälä
Martin Renvoize
Lari Taskula
Julian Maurice