This script takes parameters:
days - how many days waiting to concal an unfilled hold on or after
library - (repeatable) branches to consider
holidays - whether or not to count holidays (default is no)
This patchset adds two methods and covers them with tests:
Koha::Holds->unfilled(); To return holds where found = undef
Koha::Hold->age( $use_calendar ); To return the number of days since a
hold was placed (including or excluding holidays)
To test:
1 - Place some holds with varying reservedates
2 - Run script with different parameters to verify options are respected
(-v for verbosity will assist here)
3 - verify that script does nothing without days parameter
Sponsored by:
Siskiyou County Library (http://www.siskiyoulibrary.info/)
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Bug 16187 - Followup
1 - Correct use of original (bad) script name
2 - Explain options better
3 - Remove change from 'W' to 'w'
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
RM note: Squashed for readability
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch removes the need for Carp::Always in .../Reserves/MultiplePerRecord.t
which is not actually used.
It also removes 'undef' from Koha::Holds::forced_hold_level's last return, to comply with
our QA rules.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Reported by Katrin:
Example:
- on shelf holds allowed
- holds allowed 5
- holds on same record allowed 5
- FORCE item level holds
On a record with only one item, you can only place a record level hold
in OPAC now - which is against your circulation conditions.
Another example:
- record with 2 items
- circulation rules as above, 1 hold allowed on the record
- Item level holds: forced
I can only place record level holds in OPAC and staff. At the moment, I
am not able to place item level holds in any circumstances in my
installation.
Test Plan:
1) Apply the unit test patch
2) prove t/db_dependent/Reserves/MultiplePerRecord.t
should fail
3) Apply the second patch
4) prove t/db_dependent/Reserves/MultiplePerRecord.t
should pass
5) Attempt to replicate one of the examples above, you should be unable to
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Rokseth <benjamin.rokseth@kul.oslo.kommune.no>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
* Add tests for CanItemBeReserved returns 'itemAlreadyOnHold' to t/db_dependent/Holds.t
* Don't let GetReserveId explode
* Use search instead of map
* Remove instances of resbarcode
* Fix badly formed li closing tag
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason M. Burds <JBurds@dubuque.lib.ia.us>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Rokseth <benjamin.rokseth@kul.oslo.kommune.no>
In a few case (at least systempreferences and export_format (csv profiles),
the type method of Koha::Object and Koha::Objects can be in conflict with the
column names.
Indeed systempreferences.type exists and so the method will return
'Systempreference' (the name of the module) instead of the value of the row in
DB.
I have found at least 1 place where it can cause issue:
In C4::Context->set_preference:
601 my $syspref = Koha::Config::SysPrefs->find( $var );
602 my $type = $syspref ? $syspref->type() : undef;
603
604 $value = 0 if ( $type && $type eq 'YesNo' && $value eq '' );
type will always be 'Systempreference' and the YesNo pref will be set to an
empty string '' instead of 0.
I am not sure about the consequences of this, but it is preferable to
fix it ASAP.
To reproduce:
0/ Do not apply this patch
1/ Edit a YesNo prefs, AutoEmailOpacUser for instance
2/ Set it to "Don't sent"
3/ Check the value in DB, it should be set to an empty string, instead
of 0
4/ Apply this patch and try again. Now the value should be 0
Followed test plan, value is now 0 as expected.
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Weaver <jweaver@bywatersolutions.com>
This is the original patch for bug 12892 and replaces the older style of
fetching the holds data with Koha Objects. It will be used as a
foundation for future features.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Create a hold, set to waiting
3) Browse to circulation.pl for that patron
4) Note you see the list of waiting holds
5) Switch your logged in branch to a different branch
6) Note the "Waiting at" line is no longer emphasized.
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Cathi Wiggins <CWIGGINS@ci.arcadia.ca.us>
Signed-off-by: Megan Wianecki <mwianecki@mplmain.mtpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>