This patch stores the output from ->check_recall() (a Koha::Recall
object or undef) and reuses afterwards, on a ternaty operator.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch uses the patron category of the patron who requested the most
relevant recall to check for more specific circulation rules relating to
recalls. This ensures that patrons who are allowed to place recalls are
able to fill their recalls, especially when recalls are not generally
available for all patron categories.
To test:
1) Go to Administration -> System preferences and enable UseRecalls
2) Go to Administration -> Circulation and fines rules and set a general
All/All rule and a Category A/Itemtype A rule. All values can be set
however you like except for these recalls rules:
All/All rule:
Recalls allowed: 0
Recalls per record: 0
On shelf recalls allowed: if any unavailable
Category A/Itemtype A rule:
Recalls allowed: 5
Recalls per record: 5
On shelf recalls allowed: if any unavailable
3) Find an item of Itemtype A. Check it out to Patron A (any category).
4) Log into the OPAC as Patron B (of Category A). Find the item and
place a recall on the item.
5) Back in the staff interface, check in the item. This should trigger
the recalls process so you can allocate the item to Patron B's recall,
however the pop-up box to confirm the recall does not show. This is the
bug.
6) Apply the patch and restart services
7) Check in the item again. Confirm the pop-up box to confirm the recall
shows and you are able to allocate the item to Patron B's recall.
8) Confirm tests pass t/db_dependent/Koha/Item.t
Sponsored-by: Auckland University of Technology
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch fixes the FIXME for making the methods throw an exception.
Tests are added, and POD is adapted as well.
To test:
1. Apply this patch
2. Run:
$ ktd --shell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/api/v1/patrons* \
t/db_dependent/api/v1/holds.t \
t/db_dependent/Reserves* \
t/db_dependent/Hold* \
t/db_dependent/Koha/Hold* \
t/db_dependent/Items*
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass!
3. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
The patches made an assumption that patron would always be passed. It is
within Koha, but not in the Biblios tests.
There is no scenario where we can determine pickup locations that are not in
reference to a patron (who is picking it up?) so we should always have
this parameter
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Test plan:
1. Create an item bundle (see bug 28854 comment 458)
2. Create a biblio with one item and place a hold for this item.
3. Try to add the reserved item to the bundle
You should see a message saying that the item is reserved. Next to
this message should be a button "Ignore holds and add to bundle".
4. Click on the button. There should be a message saying that the item
was added to the bundle.
5. Close the modal window and verify that the item was correctly
added to the bundle
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutiosn.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
When trying to add a checked out item to an item bundle, an alert
message will show up, giving the user a chance to return the item
immediately before adding it to the bundle
Test plan:
1. Create an item bundle (see bug 28854 comment 458)
2. Create a biblio with one item and check out this item.
3. Try to add the checked out item to the bundle
You should see a message saying that the item is checked out. Next to
this message should be a button "Check in and add to bundle".
4. Click on the button. There should be a message saying that the item
was added to the bundle.
5. Close the modal window and verify that the item was correctly
returned and added to the bundle
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch ensures a record is indexed only after the renewal transaction
has completed successfully. Otherwise the job cannot be found by the background process
worker, becaue it was not yet in the DB
To test:
1 - Make sure you are using ES, and the es indexer is running
2 - tail -f /var/log/koha/kohadev/*.log
3 - Issue an item to a patron and renew it
4 - Note error in es-indexer-output.log like:
[2023/03/21 12:22:36] [WARN] No job found for id=157 main:: /kohadevbox/koha/misc/workers/es_indexer_daemon.pl (129)
5 - Apply patch
6 - Renew again
7 There should be no error
8 - Search for the record and confirm items info displays correctly
9 - View the background jobs in admin, confirm the most recent job has completed
Signed-off-by: Janusz Kaczmarek <januszop@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Acquisition/Order.t
3) git grep "can_edit_item("
should return no results
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
The api_strings_mapping method isn't really only about api strings.. we
deal with database fields in and out.. we just happen to then use those
in to_api to map in the api.
This patch simply renames the standard method whilst we're still early.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
We should stick to DB field names as long as possible to allow re-use
and only convert to api field names via to_api_mapping at the last
moment inside the parent to_api function.
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch introduces the `api_strings_mapping` method to the
*Koha::Item* class, and makes the API spec for the following routes:
* GET /items
* GET /items/:item_id
* GET /acquisitions/orders
accept the new `+strings` parameter that can be passed through the
`x-koha-embed` header and was introduced by bug 26635. In the case of
/acquisitions/orders, you will need to use
x-koha-embed: items+strings
I introduce it here to highlight the flebility we introduced with bug
26635.
The `api_strings_mapping` method has its roots on the cool
`columns_to_str` method already present. The main differences:
* It is aware of the `public_read_list` for attributes so no hidden
information is exposed.
* Attribute names get mapped for consistency with the API (e.g.
`homebranch` is converted into `home_library_id`, etc).
* The data structure it returns includes information about the source
for the descriptions (e.g. it it is an authorised value, then `type`
will be `av`, and the related category information is returned so
dropdowns and such can be built. The same goes for other types as
`library`, `item_type` and `call_number_source`.
To test:
1. Apply this patch
2. Reload everything
3. Play with your favourite REST tool (e.g. Postman)
4. Try:
GET http://localhost:8081/api/v1/items
x-koha-embed: +strings
=> SUCCESS: You get a list of items, they include the new _strings
structure, and the contents make sense!
5. Repeat with a specific item:
GET http://localhost:8081/api/v1/items/14
x-koha-embed: +strings
=> SUCCESS: It all makes sense!
6. Sign off :-D
Sponsored-by: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Signed-off-by: Pedro Amorim <pedro.amorim@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Bob Bennhoff - CLiC <bbennhoff@clicweb.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
We need to determine if a book was lost by a patron, the clues we have
are previous charges. If we don't find any, we shouldn't charge a new fine
To test:
1 - set Lost item fee refund on return policy to "Refund lost item charge and charge new overdue fine", turn on FinesMode, make sure your circ rules charge fines
2 - have an itemtype / patron combo that charges an overdue fine
3 - check item out (with a due date in the future) and then right back in again
4 - confirm patron doesn't have a fine because the item was not late
5 - set the item to Lost
6 - in the database, edit the date_due of your checkout to a date in the past
7 - check the item in, it is marked found
8 - confirm your patron now has a fine
9 - Apply patch
10 - Repeat with a new item and patron
11 - Confirm no charges
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch makes the `Koha::Item->safe_to_delete` method return right
after one of the checked conditions is met. This way we avoid further DB
queries and processing.
No behavior change is expected
To test:
1. Run:
$ kshell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Item.t
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass!
2. Apply this patch
3. Repeat 1
=> SUCCESS: Tests STILL pass!
4. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Bug 32528: Change return logic
Back to 1 return statement
Prevent the Koha::Result::Boolean instanciation duplication
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Currently, the Koha::Item->safe_to_delete method checks (among other things) if there are existing waiting or in-transit holds.
It seems that 'In processing' should block item deletion as well.
This patch implements that.
To test:
1. Apply up to the regression tests
2. Run:
$ kshell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Item.t
=> FAIL: Boo! Tests fail!
3. Apply this patch
4. Repeat 2
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass!
5. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This is a follow-up for bug 28854 to prevent bundle type items from
being nested in to other bundles.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
On commit 4d994773f8
Koha::Item->_set_found_trigger gets the call to get_lostreturn_policy()
changed so it expects a hashref instead of the scalar it returns. This
patch adjusts it back.
To test:
1. Run:
$ kshell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Item.t
=> FAIL: Tests fail!
2. Apply this patch
3. Repeat 1
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass!
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
The code for get_processingreturn_policy was very similar to
get_lostreturn_policy. Combining the two methods allows for use of
get_effective_rules which uses get_effective_rule_value which is cached.
This should reduce lines of code and improve performance
Tests updated and adjusted as well
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This enhancement gives the ability to set a policy for the lost item
processing fee that may get charged additional to the lost item
replacement cost. The processing fee can be:
- refunded
- refunded if unpaid
- kept
To test:
Set-up
1. Find an item, Item A. Go to Administration -> Item types and edit the
item type for Item A. Add a default replacement cost and a processing
fee and Save.
2. Go to Administration -> system preferences and set the following:
- WhenLostChargeReplacementFee: Charge
- BlockReturnOfLostItems: Don't block
3. Scroll down to the default lost item fee refund on return policy. Set
the refund lost item replacement fee policy to 'refund lost item charge'.
4. Edit Item A and set a replacement cost.
Reproduce
5. Check out Item A to Patron A.
6. Click the barcode to view Item A's information. Edit Item A and set
the Lost status to 'lost'.
7. Go back to Patron A's checkouts. The item should now be checked in
with two new charges applied - a lost item fee (the item's replacement
cost) and a lost item processing fee (set in item types).
8. Check in Item A to mark it as found.
9. Go back to Patron A's account. Notice the lost item fee has been
refunded, but the processing fee remains.
10. Manually pay or write off the processing fee. This enhancement
removes the need for this manual step.
11. Apply the patch and restart services
Test with lost item - refund
12. Go to Administration -> circulation and fines rules. Scroll down to
the default lost item fee refund on return policy. Notice there is now a
refund lost item processing fee policy. Set this to 'refund lost item
processing charge'.
13. Repeat steps 6 to 9.
14. Go back to Patron A's account. Both the lost item fee and processing
fee should have been refunded.
15. Repeat steps 6 to 8 (do not check it yet).
16. Go back to Patron A's account. Pay the processing fee.
17. Repeat step 9.
18. Go back to Patron A's account. Both the lost item fee and processing
fee should have been refunded (you'll now be in a credit because the
paid processing fee was also refunded).
Test with lost item - refund_unpaid
19. Go to Administration -> circulation and fines rules. Scroll down to
the default lost item fee refund on return policy. Notice there is now a
refund lost item processing fee policy. Set this to 'refund lost item
processing charge (only if unpaid)'.
20. Repeat steps 6 to 9.
21. Go back to Patron A's account. Both the lost item fee and processing
fee should have been refunded.
22. Repeat steps 16 to 19.
23. Go back to Patron A's account. The lost item fee should have been
refunded but not the processing fee, as this was already paid.
Test with lost item - leave
24. Go to Administration -> circulation and fines rules. Scroll down to
the default lost item fee refund on return policy. Notice there is now a
refund lost item processing fee policy. Set this to 'leave lost item
processing charge'.
25. Repeat steps 6 to 9.
26. Go back to Patron A's account. The lost item fee and processing fee
should have been refunded but not the processing fee.
Other tests
27. Confirm tests pass
- t/db_dependent/Koha/Item.t
- t/db_dependent/Koha/CirculationRules.t
Sponsored-by: Auckland University of Technology
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
The question whether item is denied renewal doesn't depend on
circulation rules or the patron, it is only a property of the item and
only changes to the item's attributes can cause the return value of
the check to change, thus we should move this to be a method of
Koha::Item.
To test:
1) Run unit tests
$ prove t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
$ prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Item.t
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
marc_subfield_structure.kohafield can be NULL, but it can also be an
empty string. But in that case, Koha::Item::as_marc_field ignores them,
which means the resulting MARC::Field object has missing data.
This can produce a bug in OPAC ISBD view (and probably other places
where this method is used)
Test plan:
1. Edit the default biblio MARC framework for the item field: find or
create a subfield that is not linked to a DB column.
Save even if you made no changes to make sure that
marc_subfield_structure.kohafield is set to an empty string.
I'll use 995$Z as an example for the following steps.
2. Add the following to syspref OPACISBD:
#995|<br>Item:|{995Z}|
3. Create a biblio with an item and put a value into 995$Z
4. Go to the ISBD detail page for this record at OPAC. Confirm that the
value you entered in 995$Z is not visible
5. Apply patch and restart koha
6. Refresh the ISBD detail page. Confirm that the 995$Z is now visible.
7. Run `prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Item.t`
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
In Koha/Item.pm line 169 (line number has been changed)
Test plan:
You need location to be NULL when storing.
Otherwise follow this reasoning:
What happens when location is undefined? It is autovivified to
empty string in the string compare (ne), so not equal to CART
and PROC. The subcondition is true before and after this patch.
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylmala@iki.fi>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Some libraries handle refunding of paid lost fees at a financial office and not within Koha. To facilitate this, it would be good for Koha to have the option to not generate lost returned credits by skipping fully paid lost items, and only refunding the outstanding balance on partially paid lost fees.
Test Plan:
1) Apply this patch
2) Set your lost item refund on return policies to 'Only if unpaid'
3) Mark an item lost, charging the lost fee
4) Return the item, a full refund should occur
5) Mark another item lost, charging the lost fee
6) Make a partial payment on this lost fee
7) Return the item
8) The remaining balance of that fee should be 0, but the patron should
not recieve a credit for the already paid balance
8) Mark another item lost, charging the lost fee
9) Fully pay the lost fee
10) Return the item. The paid lost fee should be unaffected.
11) Run tests in t/db_dependent/Circulation.t
Signed-off-by: Lisette Scheer <lisetteslatah@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
The idea rely on the KohaDates TT plugin for the date formatting. We
should not have any output_pref calls in pl or pm (there are some
exceptions, for ILSDI for instance).
Also flatpickr will deal with the places where dates are inputed. We
will pass the raw SQL value (what we call 'iso' in Koha::DateUtils), and
the controller will receive the same value, no need to additional
conversion.
Note that DBIC has the capability to auto-deflate DateTime objects,
which makes things way easier. We can either pass the value we receive
from the controller, or pass a DT object to our methods.
Signed-off-by: Victor Grousset/tuxayo <victor@tuxayo.net>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This reduces lookups for the related items that we now fetch in the templates
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Has to move some code to a method
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch makes the get_transfer and get_transfers methods internally
use the new ->filter_by_current method.
To test:
1. Run:
$ kshell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Item.t
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass!
2. Apply this rewriting patch
3. Repeat 1
=> SUCCESS: Tests still pass!
4. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
We could like to track down when an item has been moved to the
deleteditems table.
Test plan:
Created a new item, delete it
Not that the deleteditems.deleted_on value is set correctly
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch adds effective_item_type_id to the items api.
We overload the to_api method to append the effective_item_type_id field
with that of the effective itemtype code.
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
* Typo in code comment
* Permissions on atomicupdate
* Missing TT filter in template
* Spelling in template
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch adds the return claim details to the bundle item status
display on the catalogue details page.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch records the bundle issue from which an item is marked as lost
so that we may use that to infer who lost the item (for later charges
and display).
Test plan
0) Apply all patches up to this point
1) Checkout a bundle to a user
2) Checkin the bundle and do not scan one of the barcodes at
confirmation
* Note that the item not scanned is marked as lost
3) Navigate to the biblio for the lost item and note that it is marked
as lost.
4) Navigate to the biblio for the collection and expand the collection
item that contains the lost item. Note the item is marked as lost and
checkout details are listed.
5) Checkin the lost item
* The item should be marked as found and the return_claims line should
be marked as resolved.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch adds methods the the Koha::Item object for managing item
bundling operations and then exposes those methods via the REST API.
We include the new `BundleNotLoanValue` preference for setting not
for loan values when an item is added to a bundle.
Finally, we expose bundle management via the catalogue details page.
Test plan:
0) Apply patches up to this point and run the database update
1) Configuration: `BundleNotLoanValue` should have been set by the
database update and point to a newly added AV value.
2) Creating a new bundle
* Add a new bib record
* Mark the bib record as a 'collection' type by setting leader
position 7 to 'c'
* Add a new item to this bib record
* You should see a new 'Manage bundle' button available in the
'Actions' column of the Holdings table.
* Clicking 'Manage bundle' should expand the table to include a new
row directly beneath this one.
* Use the new 'Add to bundle' button that appears in this row to
trigger a modal that allows entering the barcode of items you wish
to add to the bundle
* Upon closing the modal, the bundle content table should reload and
contain your newly associated items.
* You can subsequently remove an item from a bundle using the new
'Remove' button.
3) Not for loan
* Items that have been added into a bundle should now appear as 'Not
for loan' from their original biblio record and note which bundle
they belong to.
4) Error cases
* Try adding an item that already belongs to a bundle to another
bundle: Note an error is displayed in the modal form.
5) The bundles feature can be disabled by unsetting the
`BundleNotLoanValue` system preference.
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
To test:
1 - Find a record with an item gorup, or add a group
2 - Add an item to this group, ensure it is the only item in the group
3 - Delete the item
4 - Confirm the gorup was also deleted
5 - prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Biblio/ItemGroups.t
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch reomves the second occurence of setting daeaccessioned today,
outside of the 'add/update' handling in Koha::Item->store.
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel de Rooy <m.de.rooy@rijksmuseum.nl>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
This patch makes the places in which Koha enqueues holds queue for
real time updates verify the feature is enabled.
To test:
1. Apply this patches up to the unit tests
2. Run:
$ updatedatabase
$ kshell
k$ git diff origin/master --name-only | grep -e '\.t$' | xargs prove
=> FAIL: tests fail, the code doesn't care about the syspref
3. Apply this patch
4. Repeat 2
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass!
5. Be happy!
6. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: David Nind <david@davidnind.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
This patch deals with the fact that high-level circualtion methods like
`AddIssue`, `AddReturn` and `ModDateLastSeen` all eventually call
lower-level methods like ModBiblio, Koha::Item->store of
UpdateTotalIssues which are expected to trigger holds queue updates (for
the object CRUD operations use cases). As the circulation methods need
to trigger holds queue update as well, duplicate updates were being
requested which is suboptimal, of course.
In order to prevent this, and because circulation methdos could trigger
holds queue updates several times, actually, I added a new parameter
*skip_holds_queue* to the low-level methods, so when they are called
from circulation, the trigger is skipped and we have greater control on
when and how holds queue updates are scheduled.
This patch introduces the `skip_holds_queue` parameter to the following
methods:
* C4::Biblio::ModBiblio
* C4::Biblio::UpdateTotalIssues
* Koha::Item->store
Calls to those methods from the following methods will include the new
parameter, and thus duplicated holds queue updates avoided:
* C4::Circulation::AddIssue
* C4::Circulation::AddReturn
* C4::Items::ModDateLastSeen
Tests are added, to verify that the (mocked) BatchUpdateBiblioHoldsQueue
task is only scheduled once when they are called.
To test:
1. Apply up to the previous patch
2. Run:
$ kshell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/Biblio.t \
t/db_dependent/Biblio_holdsqueue.t \
t/db_dependent/Circulation_holdsqueue.t
=> FAIL: Tests fail!
3. Apply this patch
4. Repeat 2
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass!
5. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
This patch makes the following actions trigger a holds queue rebuild for
the related biblio:
- Adding an item
- Updating an item
- Deleting an item
To test:
1. Apply this patch
2. Run:
$ kshell
k$ prove t/db_dependent/Koha/Item.t
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass! Background job scheduled
3. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Fridolin Somers <fridolin.somers@biblibre.com>
Tomas Cohen Arazi
Aleisha Amohia
Nick Clemens
Julian Maurice
Kyle Hall
Martin Renvoize
Joonas Kylmälä
Marcel de Rooy
Stefan Berndtsson
Jonathan Druart
Katrin Fischer
David Cook