Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Brendan Lawlor <blawlor@clamsnet.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@openfifth.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Lucas Gass <lucas@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Owen Leonard <oleonard@myacpl.org>
Signed-off-by: Nick Clemens <nick@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
This commit is generated using:
% perl misc/devel/tidy.pl
*within* ktd, to get the same version of perltidy than what will be used
by our CI (currently v20230309).
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
On bug 17591 we discovered that there was something weird going on with
the way we export and use subroutines/modules.
This patch tries to standardize our EXPORT to use EXPORT_OK only.
That way we will need to explicitely define the subroutine we want to
use from a module.
This patch is a squashed version of:
Bug 17600: After export.pl
Bug 17600: After perlimport
Bug 17600: Manual changes
Bug 17600: Other manual changes after second perlimports run
Bug 17600: Fix tests
And a lot of other manual changes.
export.pl is a dirty script that can be found on bug 17600.
"perlimport" is:
git clone https://github.com/oalders/App-perlimports.git
cd App-perlimports/
cpanm --installdeps .
export PERL5LIB="$PERL5LIB:/kohadevbox/koha/App-perlimports/lib"
find . \( -name "*.pl" -o -name "*.pm" \) -exec perl App-perlimports/script/perlimports --inplace-edit --no-preserve-unused --filename {} \;
The ideas of this patch are to:
* use EXPORT_OK instead of EXPORT
* perltidy the EXPORT_OK list
* remove '&' before the subroutine names
* remove some uneeded use statements
* explicitely import the subroutines we need within the controllers or
modules
Note that the private subroutines (starting with _) should not be
exported (and not used from outside of the module except from tests).
EXPORT vs EXPORT_OK (from
https://www.thegeekstuff.com/2010/06/perl-exporter-examples/)
"""
Export allows to export the functions and variables of modules to user’s namespace using the standard import method. This way, we don’t need to create the objects for the modules to access it’s members.
@EXPORT and @EXPORT_OK are the two main variables used during export operation.
@EXPORT contains list of symbols (subroutines and variables) of the module to be exported into the caller namespace.
@EXPORT_OK does export of symbols on demand basis.
"""
If this patch caused a conflict with a patch you wrote prior to its
push:
* Make sure you are not reintroducing a "use" statement that has been
removed
* "$subroutine" is not exported by the C4::$MODULE module
means that you need to add the subroutine to the @EXPORT_OK list
* Bareword "$subroutine" not allowed while "strict subs"
means that you didn't imported the subroutine from the module:
- use $MODULE qw( $subroutine list );
You can also use the fully qualified namespace: C4::$MODULE::$subroutine
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
This patch overloads the 'options' accessor generated by Class:Accessor.
It does so the passed options are used to refresh the loaded filters.
Tests are added for this overloaded method as well.
To test:
1. Apply this patches
2. Run:
$ kshell
k$ prove t/RecordProcessor.t
=> SUCCESS: Tests pass!
3. Sign off :-D
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer.83@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <martin.renvoize@ptfs-europe.com>
This patch:
- makes the Koha::RecordProcessor code more clear
by removing the unnecessary newrecord variable.
- revises the filter to be more clear about the
expectation that operations are done directly on
the record parameter.
TEST PLAN
---------
prove t/RecordProcessor.t
prove t/db_dependent/Filter_MARC_ViewPolicy.t
run koha qa test tools
Signed-off-by: Hector Castro <hector.hecaxmmx@gmail.com>
Works as advertised. NO koha-qa errors
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@theke.io>
Signed-off-by: Brendan A Gallagher <brendan@bywatersolutions.com>
TEST PLAN
---------
1) Apply all three patches
2) prove -v t/RecordProcessor.t
-- all should be successful
3) run koha qa test tools
Signed-off-by: Marc Véron <veron@veron.ch>
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Brendan Gallagher brendan@bywatersolutions.com
The docs say that Koha::RecordProcessor accepts more than one filter
at a time. But as the regression tests show it doesn't.
This is really important to extend its usage in record processing
(either to enforce policy, transform, etc).
This patch makes ->new evaluate the reference type of the passed filters
and builds an array with a single item if a scalar has been passed. The
loop now explicitly casts the filters as an array.
To test:
- Apply the test patch
- Run
$ prove t/RecordProcessor.t
=> FAIL: tests fail because Koha::RecordProcessor doesn't hanlde
more than one filter at a time.
- Apply this patch
- Run
$ prove t/RecordProcessor.t
=> SUCCESS: tests now pass
- Easy, right? Sign off :-D
NOTE: Read code. Don't like the ? operator logic, but it is
functional despite readability issues.
Signed-off-by: Mark Tompsett <mtompset@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@bugs.koha-community.org>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@unc.edu.ar>
Signed-off-by: Chris Nighswonger <cnighswonger@foundations.edu>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <katrin.fischer@bsz-bw.de>
http://bugs.koha-community.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9987
Signed-off-by: Kyle M Hall <kyle@bywatersolutions.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This patch adds the Koha::Indexer::RecordNormalizer and
Koha::Indexer::MARC::RecordNormalizer::EmbedSeeFromHeadings packages
to enable the inclusion of alternate forms of headings in bibliographic
searches. When the new syspref IncludeSeeFromInSearches is turned on
(default is off) rebuild_zebra.pl will insert see from headings from
authority records into bibliographic records when indexing, so that a
search on an obsolete term will turn up relevant records.
To test:
1) Enable IncludeSeeFromInSearches
2) Add a heading that has an alternate form to a record (for example,
"Cooking" has the alternate form "Cookery," if you have authority
records from LC)
3) Index the zebraqueue (or reindex if you haven't indexed your system
yet)
4) Confirm that if you search for "Cookery" you get the record you
just modified
Signed-off-by: Jared Camins-Esakov <jcamins@cpbibliography.com>
Rebased on master 5 August 2012
Signed-off-by: Jared Camins-Esakov <jcamins@cpbibliography.com>
Rebased on master 11 September 2012
Signed-off-by: Katrin Fischer <Katrin.Fischer.83@web.de>
Also checked:
- Verified database update works correctly
- Checked system preference and its description
- Checked staff/opac detail pages with feature on/off
- Checked staff/opac search facets
- Downloaded and tested records in various formats
- Tried different searches for 'see from' entries of authorities
- Ran all unit tests
No problems found.