Bug 12287 - Hold priority for new hold incorrect if record has holds in transit
When placing a new hold, the listed priority for the hold will be incorrect if there are any holds with items in transit ( i.e. found = T ). Test Plan: 1) Place 3 holds on a record with at least 2 items 2) Fill one hold so it is marked as waiting 3) Fill on hold so it is marked as in transit 4) Begin placing a new hold 5) Note the expected priority would be 2, but is actually 3 6) Apply this patch 7) Reload the patch, now the expected priority shows correctly Signed-off-by: Coralie Barsacq <c.barsacq@mairie-laciotat.fr> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart@biblibre.com> Signed-off-by: Tomas Cohen Arazi <tomascohen@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
0d03da1773
commit
11bacd8f65
|
|
@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ foreach my $biblionumber (@biblionumbers) {
|
|||
my $alreadyreserved = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
foreach my $res (@$reserves) {
|
||||
if ( defined $res->{found} && $res->{found} eq 'W' ) {
|
||||
if ( defined $res->{found} ) {
|
||||
$count--;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue